Originally posted by
![[info]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v8NpfzzK_W8Sj-S30_NO51mUN1-ZgZj9KFbOSu6VDcg6UMJZKDq-ZOPa09FJa-fain6pq_yD9KOltjBFuTnGD1bcP-Igf4xNTwBwr9PRygruNSvA=s0-d){kind=small}
savliy at role of elites December 11 - a turning point in the day people are aware of their hatred of the government. True, there is no nationwide organization with a positive program, which is opposed by the authorities. This indicates unavailability elites to invest in projects of a certain "Russian party". While the factor of "top" does not work, people will revel in his anger without any results.
take over the minds of both the turn of the 80-90 by a throw into the community new ideas will not work. All of the ideas already expressed many times. In addition, the density of information noise is very loud. People want a change of paradigm, but do not know what they want instead of what is there. Just want the good. Rational thought can only be the elite. It was they who will order the "music", if they wish. Do not want to - the collapse continues, anger - and even grow to acquire the pathological form.
course neither bad nor good is being done. Policy is carried out by people who make a selfless contribution to their work, or work for a fee as professionals. No other choice. To mass up and went somewhere else, you need to have someone took her. Slogans - minor matters. Go to the situation slogans you can think of half an hour. Question: where to and what to Chichi? " Where about is understandable. Everything else - just in case, shifts in elite that yet. Will - all formed itself themselves. Without it - just street noise and cooking teeth grinding.
In all revolutions of government goes against the government based on popular support or military. Or on foreign resources, and interventionists. In any case, someone has to invest resources in changing the regime or paradigm. With all the inefficiency of government, it has the resources to multiply more than those that are consolidated by enthusiasts. To her shift and be replaced by another, we need multiple smaller resources at a multiple of a stronger paradigm. But with zero balances will be zero and in business. Communication by themselves do not appear, they someone organizes and controls.
art of politics and war is everywhere the same. Strategy, training, technical equipment, mass mobilization - the conditions of victory. Separated of public policy ideas are doomed to exist in sects and delusional about the fact that once the sect suddenly receive recognition and be demand. This is a mistake. Such "sects tea table" can be set and the instrument of publicity is brought to own a few. Such tools significantly less than random groupings. Can be hundreds of times smaller.
There are politics as entertainment, or elective and politics as a profession. At leisure, you can invent anything. If lots of people invent the same thing, it does not mean that an invention become a reality. Any political force can be noticeable phenomenon only in the case of replicating its facilities. That requires resources, and resources come at a time when there is a request for something new. This new in the collapsed state is a party project. The request must come from the elites with the resources and seeking novelty. By itself, life has not changed. Its someone needs to change.
Andrei Saveliev
take over the minds of both the turn of the 80-90 by a throw into the community new ideas will not work. All of the ideas already expressed many times. In addition, the density of information noise is very loud. People want a change of paradigm, but do not know what they want instead of what is there. Just want the good. Rational thought can only be the elite. It was they who will order the "music", if they wish. Do not want to - the collapse continues, anger - and even grow to acquire the pathological form.
course neither bad nor good is being done. Policy is carried out by people who make a selfless contribution to their work, or work for a fee as professionals. No other choice. To mass up and went somewhere else, you need to have someone took her. Slogans - minor matters. Go to the situation slogans you can think of half an hour. Question: where to and what to Chichi? " Where about is understandable. Everything else - just in case, shifts in elite that yet. Will - all formed itself themselves. Without it - just street noise and cooking teeth grinding.
In all revolutions of government goes against the government based on popular support or military. Or on foreign resources, and interventionists. In any case, someone has to invest resources in changing the regime or paradigm. With all the inefficiency of government, it has the resources to multiply more than those that are consolidated by enthusiasts. To her shift and be replaced by another, we need multiple smaller resources at a multiple of a stronger paradigm. But with zero balances will be zero and in business. Communication by themselves do not appear, they someone organizes and controls.
art of politics and war is everywhere the same. Strategy, training, technical equipment, mass mobilization - the conditions of victory. Separated of public policy ideas are doomed to exist in sects and delusional about the fact that once the sect suddenly receive recognition and be demand. This is a mistake. Such "sects tea table" can be set and the instrument of publicity is brought to own a few. Such tools significantly less than random groupings. Can be hundreds of times smaller.
There are politics as entertainment, or elective and politics as a profession. At leisure, you can invent anything. If lots of people invent the same thing, it does not mean that an invention become a reality. Any political force can be noticeable phenomenon only in the case of replicating its facilities. That requires resources, and resources come at a time when there is a request for something new. This new in the collapsed state is a party project. The request must come from the elites with the resources and seeking novelty. By itself, life has not changed. Its someone needs to change.
Andrei Saveliev
0 comments:
Post a Comment